Investigating Court No. 5 in Cartagena has dismissed the injunction consistent with the cessation of the works taking place in Wall Street Land of Cartagena after the adoption of the measures accurate, consistent and expert on visual inspections and various witness statements.
In order of date, the instructor concludes, regarding the length of the wall of the reign of Charles II that runs through the area, "the protective measures already adopted by the developer at the request of DG Fine Arts and Cultural Rights "to safeguard the piece of wall described as informed professionals in the field," enough "and therefore" makes no sense to agree the work stoppage. "
On the imaginary line is drawn by drawing or where in his day had to continue the wall, the magistrate judge understands that "even considering that the oft-repeated negative imprint could include the place where he was supported the foundation of the wall, no doubt that at present there is no such foundation and, of course, that wall "and adds, in its reasoning that" can not protect what does not exist "and therefore" there can be a cessation of work to protect, not destroy something that can that once existed, but not today. "
Finally, in relation to the environment of the wall, the instructor believes "there are no sufficient reasons for agreeing to halt work by the mere fact that the work environment is not defined as such delimitation or definition conforms to existing legislation and not entirely necessary for the implementation of the planned works. "
Source: CARM