Portal de Cartagena
www.portaldecartagena.com
Deputy Mayor, Agustín Guillén, and the government team spokesman, Joaquin Segado, have appeared this afternoon before the media to explain the details of the grant of planning permission in the area of Los Perín skewers, which the Deputy Mayor and head of legal services will have to declare urban interneción in magistrate's court soon.
Guillen has said that the license was originally granted in error without environmental report, but this deficiency was corrected immediately, and seek to demonstrate in his next appearance.
Guillen explained that he had called the media in view of the interest that several of them have expressed today on the news that he and the head of the Legal Service of Urban Intervention had been indicted for events in December 2006, when it was Urban area councilor.
However, he warned that, out of respect for judicial authority, was not extended too much detail, that citizens should know.
THE TALE OF THE FACTS
According to Deputy Mayor, the judicial procedure has started with a complaint of D.
Antonio Martínez Díaz, a promoter who has launched, at least 14 disciplinary proceedings committed by illegal development works promoted to his name and company name.
This offender is presented to the prosecutor's complaint that led to the charges.
The fact at issue is the granting by the city of Cartagena in a license to build a house in the area of Los Skewers Perín, requested D.
Botella José Luis García on 8 September 2006.
The license was signed by Agustín Guillén and Town Planning on December 19, 2006, when it came to your table accompanied by legal and technical reports required by law.
As pointed out in the Urban Information Service there are two architects licensed capacity to report.
The architect who specializes in that area of the City refrain from reporting by family ties with the architects who signed the work and the matter is the second of them, Guillen continued.
The site is located in an area affected by the Plan of Management of Natural Resources of the Sierra de La Muela, Cape Tiñoso and Mount Roland and any license requires a previous report from the General Directorate of Natural Environment.
The architect reported favorably without the prior request of the Environment report because, according to Guillen, he was convinced that the report was necessary because the site was located within a rural settlement.
It was, according to Deputy Mayor, the first report that the architect had in that area and until the adoption of PORN, six months earlier, this was the normal procedure for licensing in rural core.
The license was reported favorably by the architect, by the head of the Legal Service of Urban Intervention, and finally signed by the council.
On February 27, 2007 presented himself at Urban D.
Liarte Pedro Paredes made a verbal complaint in which he warned that such leave was granted without the need of the Environment report.
On the same day and immediately, the head of the Legal Service of Urban Intervention requested a report to the architect and the architect on the same day confirmed that the site was affected by the PORN and therefore should have been asked to report to the Natural Environment.
As a result of this proposal from the Head of Legal Department, two days later the Town Planning signed the decree suspending the effects of the license.
This suspension was communicated to those affected and also found that the site had not done any work.
Suspended license and after informing the concerned Urban asked the Natural Environment report, the September 20, 2007.
On April 23, 2008, the Community requests cadastral data from the field and on 3 December 2008 at City Hall receives a favorable report from the Natural Environment.
From that time again to collect the technical reports and finally the license is granted on 1 April this year.
The Deputy Mayor has said that to date has not been done any work in that lot and for that fact from Urban has opened a case for revocation of the license.
A REPORT FULL OF LIES AND SPECULATION
These are the facts on which, under Agustín Guillén, the complainant has constructed a story full of lies and speculation.
To the vice mayor, the complainant wants to see that this error was corrected immediately constitutes a crime of administrative malfeasance.
He says he has given favorable treatment because the applicant is the owner of a restaurant frequented by members of the municipal government.
He also says that favorable treatment was given to the applicant because it is the husband of Doña Maria Dolores Galindo, a senior City Hall.
The first argument becomes suspect to any restaurant owner or any shopkeeper Cartagena.El second argument is another lie because Maria Dolores Galindo was not connected with the city until one year after the grant of the license, Guillen explained.
Finally, the Deputy Mayor said that this is not a pleasant situation for workers engaged Urbanism monitor compliance and is now being questioned by a habitual offender.
Not a pleasant subject, but all officers and I are confident that everything will be clarified as soon as the prosecutor and the judge handling the case have the opportunity to hear our arguments and our tests.
Source: Ayuntamiento de Cartagena
Privacy policy
- Legal notice
- Cookies