Portal de Cartagena
www.portaldecartagena.com
Note from ANSE:
The PGMO proposes a target of nearly half a million homes in Cartagena, of which 226,000 would be provided for development planning (urban land and urban land sectorized unsectorised).
That is, plans to build as many new homes built along the municipality's history.
In other words, we propose the development of 110,000,000 m2 to 50,000,000 m2 in addition to the city will involve the development of a third of the municipality.
The proposed developable area is double the current urban area, and lowers the level of protection currently existing agricultural landscapes south of the Mar Menor and the west side of town.
The PGMO appointment but not in any way integrates concepts such as sustainability, creative, local, sustainable land use, sustainable urban mobility, compact city, etc ... On the contrary, as the proposed projects are excellent examples of unsustainability, land consumption, commitment to a car-based mobility, consumption of undeveloped coastline, etc.
The Plan is contrary to the principles of the European Spatial Development, and that does not provide a solution to rural-urban imbalance, but tends to complete the development of low-lying undeveloped and does not protect productive and profitable activities such as agriculture in west coast, where this activity completely disappears, and the downtown area.
Also highlights the statement as part of estate of pine woods of the Portman Bay and Huerta Chaise forest, near the Regional Park Calblanque, Monte de las Cenizas y Peña del Águila, to allow the construction of hundreds of homes.
Although the document recognizes the high environmental impact of urbanization, the new General Plan removes the undeveloped land protection as Forest Protection Monte San Julián and Sierra Gorda to allow the construction of residential areas.
The municipal government has been limited to undeveloped land included as specific protection was required by those regulations sector: areas protected by Community law, public water and costs.
The city council has no port
appropriate assessment of impacts of PGMO on the Natura 2000 network which is a breach of the Habitats Directive.
Therefore, must be assessed and subjected again to public exposure.
The General Plan includes major urbanized areas as agricultural soils that have received community grants to improve irrigation, processing incompatible with urban development, it must be applied to the repayment of such grants or maintenance of their classification as Soil No Agricultural developable.
As if this were not enough, the city has shown an unwillingness to enforce the planning regulations and protection even within protected areas, as in the EN, SCI and SPA Sierra de La Muela-Cabo Tiñoso where advertising is for months that it will proceed to the legalization of most illegal homes built in recent years through the expansion of villages, or whatever it is, urban qualify as large areas of land which should be declared as non-development Environmental Protection.
Source: ANSE
Privacy policy
- Legal notice
- Cookies