Portal de Cartagena
www.portaldecartagena.com
Jose Lopez governs We thank Cartagena.
It should be remembered every time we try to sell as opposition in Cartagena.
One of the functions assigned to the opposition Law is to control government action but as anyone who follows now know, we can in Cartagena is characterized by controlling the action of the Municipal People's Party.
It's his way of keeping safe a government that is his creature.
So we attended so often to tricks, postureos and dissimulation in which we can begin pretending outrage at the absurdities of the Government to end always deflecting the shot towards the opposition (the truth) and saving face Lopez and Castejon.
We saved the budget simulate Lopez after a negotiation that would convince whoever be persuaded;
We voted to hold police responsible councilor pool that was made illegal;
We voted to keep the controversial website created by the government to deny the press;
We voted to keep the manager of the Agency who lost hundreds of thousands of euros for the unemployed.
In all these cases, he pretended indignation of plasterboard and finished maneuvering motions-massage or directly with their votes against the opposition (the truth).
Whenever the government of Lopez and Castejon is trapped by a controversial, we take the cloak and opens the back door to not have to take responsibility.
When Spain witnessed attitudes Lopez in plenary until -second of Inigo Errejón we can- said it was "unseemly" Mrs. Marcos maneuvered the government to withdraw Citizens disapproval of the mayor.
He gave as Lopez had compared their circles with the "manolo run" or that he reproached his dark little swim a lot and work.
And now it turns out that the blame for the full are a sorry spectacle is not Lopez, but of all.
As Castejon, Marcos says insulted councilors are to blame for receiving insults.
The article published yesterday by the spokesman can test that strategy under permanent government.
Marcos draws the Popular Party as responsible for all the ills.
He accuses us of being against the renewal of the Santa Florentina market that did not vote a motion yours;
clear that hides the "little detail" that our proposal was that traders participate in the reform and his party voted against.
He suggests that PP and C, s not censor abuses of the dictatorship, mostly because we do not oppose the name to the square of San Sebastian is changed.
Of course, Mrs. Marcos hidden voters that this change was not approved by the government-for fortune declined.
Yes, it's true: we abstained on the motion to protect the prickly pear (decision Marcos presented as a kind of ecological attack).
We believe that the measures we could go against the Plant Protection Act and in plenary with real participation we would have explained.
And, no, it is false: we do not vote against all the motions.
We have voted together and do not rule out the possibility of the House with a proposal of interest to Cartagena.
But the fact is that, on the core issues for Cartagena and democratic health of the plenary, we have shown that the survival of the government considered an absolute good that must be saved at all costs.
What we believe is that protection against the prickly pear cochineal is important, but more important is to protect the Cartagena against improvisation, abuse and neglect of the government.
That's what identifies a political group as opposition group.
Signed,
Group spokesman Municipal People
Francisco José Espejo García
Source: PP Cartagena
Privacy policy
- Legal notice
- Cookies