Portal de Cartagena
www.portaldecartagena.com
The association believes that the General Plan is the essential tool for managing land and activities of the municipality, key to the development model of the coming decades, and should be taken into account in the discussions of the various political forces to any agreement governing and election of the new corporation
The recent judgment of the Superior Court of Murcia canceling the Review of the Municipal General Management Plan of Cartagena, and its approval by the Autonomous Community, declaring them null, confirms, from the point of view of ANSE, serious deficiencies background document ordering the use of land in the municipality of Cartagena, and requires revising the document finally adopted in late 2011.
The ruling, which upheld the appeal of the EMASA construction and should not be challenged, acknowledges that defects are numerous and encompass the entire municipality, as ANSE has maintained since appealed to the Autonomous Community approval of the revised text, appeal was never answered.
First of all, the ruling will force the new corporation, govern who governs, to overcome the huge number of all kinds of deficiencies that affect the fundamental territorial model, a document that should never be approved.
In addition, the modifications made must undergo public information, after incorporating many environmental and planning considerations, heritage protection and channels, risk assessment, etc.
To ANSE, the judgment provides a new opportunity for all Cartagena to pose a territorial model (a new PGOU) in our town with a commitment to environmental, economic and social sustainability, for greater dialogue and participation at the political level and citizen, and greater respect for and compliance with the rules that protect our resources and rights.
ANSE remember that the City of Cartagena and the Autonomous Region approved a new General Plan which lowered soil protection on the southern shore of the Mar Menor, consolidating the urban development of Novo Carthago, included in Cala Reona urban land and forest Atamaría not contributed basic cartographic information on natural habitats, environmental risks and various infrastructure, did not include protected land out of which it was required by European and regional regulations.
All these and many other shortcomings were negatively reported by the same Directorate-General for Environment of the Autonomous Community and were never corrected.
Both from the government team of the City as the Directorate General of Planning he stated on several occasions that they were only "opinions" that it was not required to observe.
The Association of Southeast Naturalists also filed an appeal against the Administrative approval of the Consolidated Municipal Management Plan of Cartagena, which was rejected a few weeks by the High Court of Justice of Murcia ago.
Interestingly, two of the three judges who signed the judgment which rejected the appeal of ANSE, including the president, have also been those who have rendered the judgment estimating the lawsuit filed by the builder Emasa against the approval of the General Plan.
The arguments used by judges of the Supreme Court to consider reviewing zero General Plan largely coincide with by ANSE argued in its application, although this was rejected, considering that the association should have resorted publication approving the new Plan General, instead of the revised text.
Paradoxically, in the appeal by EMASA, the Autonomous Community argued that the construction should have appealed the publication of the Consolidated precisely the appeal by ANSE without having yet received a response.
Source: ANSE
Privacy policy
- Legal notice
- Cookies