Formulate a series of questions at the next plenary motivated by the discrepancies between municipal officers, Court of Auditors and the UTE itself, once known the judgment requiring him to pay provisionally the City certifications that are owed to the UTE
The granting of El Batel, plus the Circus and the Sea of ​​Music Theatre, supposed Pablo Hernández and his circle hold a private cultural monopoly in Cartagena, but "paid Cartagena generous and deceptively"
Citizen of Cartagena (MC) Movement will present at the upcoming municipal Plenum a battery of questions about municipal action regarding the granting of the Municipal Auditorium The Batel to the Sonora-Gestípolis UTE and the discrepancies between the municipal officers, the Court of Auditors and UTE own.
And is that just a few days ago have been handed down two judgments that require the council to pay provisionally, expressly for costs, the certifications that are owed to the Sonora-Gestípolis UTE, which exploits the auditorium of El Batel, and Maintenance and Custodial Archaeological company, SL, a total amount is around 800,000 euros.
Representatives from both concessionaires, at least as visible leaders, are well known: the President of COEC and until recently few dates was the headman of La Puebla and board member of the local PP.
According to Councilman MC, Jose Lopez, at this point, "Citizens should already have your opinion on that municipal concessions relapse into active members in municipal politics and directors of the Popular Party."
For MC, the question of El Batel you think deserves some clarification, and even more when the resolution explicitly mentions that "although it has used the term subsidy in the contract", the City must pay because it is contractual and not a subsidy obligation, subject as such to the General Subsidies Act, and especially its justification.
PAYMENT REQUIRED NO JUSTIFICATION
In the words of the mayor José López, "we want to know if the municipal government and other groups participating in the award (PP, PSOE, IU), knew that the contract unconditionally forced the council to pay the UTE-called subsidy, or for example, if the municipal government was aware that where it appeared the word `subvención' what to say is` mandatory payment without alguna' justification ".
He adds that "if as it seems, the municipal government believes that it should pay that` subvención', why the technical and the Court of Auditors believe should be justified and the local government does not? ".
Indeed, Lopez continues, is that "the granting of the auditorium's hold them to the Circus Theatre and the Sea of ​​Music, question assumes that D. Pablo Hernández and his circle in Cartagena hold a private cultural monopoly, but Cartagena generous pay and misleading way. "
Therefore, MC will ask if you intend to take political responsibility for this case and if the idea of ​​outsourcing public services and facilities is to pay for it and that the city does not receive consideration.
And leave a question in the air: if private companies earn, and the City does not, what is the consideration?
Source: Movimiento Ciudadano