Portal de Cartagena

www.portaldecartagena.com

• Home
• Business
• Hotels
• Restaurants
• News
• Advertisement

Anomalies investigating the Court of Auditors in municipal management of government Pilar Barreiro denote an absolute lack of control in the public accounts.

The recruitment policy based largely on awards made to measure in our council has generated a deficit on the principle of equal concurrrencia, since many companies to qualify for contracts municpales deprived.

With this policy the resources are not optimized, public deficit is generated because we pay more for services than it really does, in a policy thus squanders public money and above lends itself to favoritism because many contracts are awarded by the procedure negotiated without publicity, ie finger, and as is clear in the report of the Court of Auditors big contracts awarded by competition, are designed for particular partner companies, such as the company that manages the Batel or until one day the Chairman of Puebla ago.

The lack of rigor not only when awarding municipal services, but also when auditing the proper performance of contracts, denotes an apathy, in our judgment calculated to benefit a few at perjucio of citizenship of Cartagena .

If the PP government team will be some glimmer of responsibility, responsible for the areas of Recruitment, Decentralization and Culture should have resigned immediately.

Such is the sense of lawlessness and above all pride that the President of the Puebla afford to say clearly allows, in addition to not understand the existence of incompatibility by having a contract of 1,500,000 euros, having been president of the Neighborhood Board of Puebla, handpicked by the same person who chairs the body awarding municipal concessions.

Above his company was responsible for the lifeguard service on the beaches of the territorial area of ​​the board that it presided, let a tangible example of ethics in the exercise of public office.

From SPCT it seems very strange that there was no business to be submitted to the contest which resulted in the award to the company of Mr. Rosillo, and the suspicions raised by the Court of Auditors' report seems to indicate the reason, it is not another, that those responsible for the award, applied a lot of flexibility with the contractor, in terms of classification requirements, solvency and experience while were relentless officially requirements required for the other companies, so relentless that did not show anyone.

Source: SPCT