The order dated July 29 ordered by the judge based Abbey with numerous case lack of legal reasoning that claim the defendants in the case of Novo Carthago by bind-litigate the various groups personates private prosecution in that case.
It also claims the car that the nature and the purposes they serve personates (Anse, PSOE, IU-Greens and Don Diego Ramon) are not necessarily coincident.
The judge recalled that based on case law decisions of a similar nature taken by the High Court in cases related to the war against terrorism.
For United Left-Greens Cartagena claims the strategy of the lawyers of the alleged transgressors, which was excluded from the pulse-Novo Carthago case to the political and social opposition in a clear desperate attempt to limit the impact of events in the case society, are inserted into a delaying strategy clearly through legitimate but misuse of rights to claim or replacement pursue what really is the time delay in the advancement of research and its sustantación.
However, the very nature of motivation, both the prosecution and the judge are serving to dismantle the fragile defense arguments that the various defendants are exercising in almost all of the resources that have been made so far.
At the same time, the United Left-Greens Cartagena regrets that the request for information and research requested by the judge the Civil Guard and the Bank of Spain have contributed little or nothing to express not have specific information about the case.
Finally, for IU-Greens Cartagena the merits of the prosecutor, in his report of 21 July 2014 concerning the dismissal of the appeal lodged by the representative of Mr. Barnabas Thomas, who had joined others is extremely revealing, and that founded on June 4 opinion on Pilar Barreiro, exhibiting in the legal aspects of the case of corruption identified a whole correlation of events reinforces the strong evidence of criminal activity of the accused in this case.
Source: IU-verdes Cartagena