Portal de Cartagena
www.portaldecartagena.com
The formation of the left calls for investing in the economies of the work of this year's budget and heading to that effect is included in the next year, then Hansa Urbana claiming a payment or charging through the collateral deposited by the company
That under foreseeable economies in implementing the current budget administrative measures necessary to initiate emergency, in the wording of the relevant project, recovery, restoration and enhancement of the monastery of San Ginés de la Jara was taken, which remember to include enough game to finish the work in heading 2015 and that the project includes the restoration of historic garden of the monastery and the hermitage of Monte Miral, claiming that it carried out the same owners or, where appropriate, execution by the City Council in the alternative, then demanding payment to the owners.
That's what I asked United Left-Greens again via a motion by Councilman Jaime Moltó Cayetano.
For IU-Greens tangible heritage of our town should be considered as a reflection of what has been, is and will be Cartagena.
It is a sign of identity, a link of all who have lived, live and will live in it.
Not forgetting interesting and historical, artistic, aesthetic, scientific, economic and tourism value.
That is a serious mistake to link maintenance, restoration or enhancement projects that could be described as megalomaniacs and require the investment of a lot of money.
Nor, despite having an undeniable importance for economic development should be limited such recovery and value those elements which, from a neoliberal perspective, produce a surplus of income over those that cost may be higher than the return economic, since all are part of our common history.
Have already been several initiatives by IU-Greens regarding the sorry state of neglect and ruin of the monastery of San Ginés de la Jara.
Thus, in January 2013 requested enforcement of the guarantee of Hansa-Urbana and rehabilitation of the monastery;
in July of that year was requested by the company defaults, the contract with Hansa Urbana;
and finally in March this year was again called for the comprehensive rehabilitation of the monastery.
In all cases the initiatives have been rejected by a municipal government team which, curiously, always boasts of its commitment to the local archaeological, artistic and historical heritage.
The Popular Party is responsible for the situation in which the monastery is currently tied for having the future of this heritage asset to the degree of concreteness of urban development as proposed by Hansa Urbana Novo Carthago.
The PP, alone, has been introduced such that roadmap with catastrophic results we are all watching and is also in accordance with current legislation Artistic Heritage guilty of not acting to preserve the Monastery San Ginés de la Jara.
Maintenance of heritage can not be subject to any contractual agreement with a private company, whatever the nature of that agreement and the responsibility of the municipality is not transferable to anyone, so you must act urgently and not wait for are settled potential differences between Hansa Urbana and the City.
And the City Council has the means to do it themselves, regardless of when the dispute over between the municipal administration and the corporation can claim relating to the company or receivable under the collateral deposited the cost of the works.
Source: IU-verdes Cartagena
Privacy policy
- Legal notice
- Cookies