Portal de Cartagena
www.portaldecartagena.com
Exposure
We have been informed that on Friday 6 June, has filed a claim of liability against the City of Cartagena by the owners of the Old Barracks Solar dela Guardia Civilde Azohía over three million.
If we follow the reasoning put forward proven right owners in court, it is expected that sooner or later sentence was pronounced on our City Council, with schizophrenia or her characteristic pride that adorn its actions, raised the following Item:
1 Modify the PERI La Chapineta enabling the former barracks of the Civil Guard until then owned by the Ministry of the Interior, to be disposed of by public auction that ministry giving, to make it more attractive, not only a private, but even commercial and hotel.
Once changed 2nd use, bought for a few individual and changed hands several times, some entrepreneurs who intend to open a hotel facilities, as required for the area and its economy appear.
On 3rd July 2006 you had passed all urban to the new owners of the solar instrument, but takes 3 years to give the strip string to initiate the work.
Finally, have signed it in October 2009 and charged them leave and charged more than € 32,000 on 21/11/2009.
4th As time passes, it is not known how they conclude to change the use of a parcel which had been modified by amending the Azohía PERI, ie became officially by the City Council.
From here you can not make a clear path of what happens, because one thing is as it seems and reality another, there is the unknown, but we can guess that the interests of the People's Party were different from the Municipality into believing or neighbors was the only possible location for future equipment when in a General Plan can create all necessary, when the appearance of the whole process seems to suggests that the only interest was to nullify the tourism project designed perhaps to favor other related sectors of the same interests to your party.
At the 5th plenary 19/05/08 PSOE Councillor Mr. Diez Torres question:
What action has made the government team on the plot of the former barracks of the Civil Guard of The Azohía?
Do you think the government team to use the land for public use such equipment?
For the government team involved Spokesperson, Mr. Segado Martinez, saying that that parcel is private and also a court of law would be entitled to build.
What is certain is that we are in negotiations, in fact last week there was contact to try to get that plot may be a public facility, but now the positions between property-hall are quite remote.
Until an agreement is reached it can not decide whether this plot will be equipment for public use or eventually use to which it is intended, which is a private use. "
This is the day 19/05/2008.
Mr. Segado recognizes that it is private, it is entitled to build and you will not reach an agreement finally their fate will be for private use.
But five months later, in its proposed General Plan, without reaching any agreement, as contemplated and Public Facilities.
In addition, it appears that in the Azohía the City owns a own land of about 800 m2 square meters, located precisely in the UA 3 Chapineta, ie very close to the expropriated and they could have used to neighborhood demands, what is even more inexplicable and unjustifiable this ability of our town and so I present the following questions:
1st - How is it possible that the wording of a General Plan where you can get the necessary equipment at no cost using the system equidistribución have placed the equipment on a plot with valid license it will cost to Cartageneros a large sum of money when another location could be free?
2nd - What legal security word so fond of his popular group, can exist in the City Council Chair that you:
- Amends the Chapineta PERI, enables Barracks dela Guardia Civilde Azohía be declared private, including commercial and hotel use, allowing the Ministry of the Interior to auction the lot and sell to resellers.
-Les approve their owners all the necessary tools, sign the act of redefinition after three years in October 2009 and charge them a license to build on 20-11-2009.
- And 31 days after the license charge, on 21-12-2009, the site qualifies as Public Facilities, then decreeing the cancellation of the license illegally as stated by the Superior Court of the Region of Murcia adjectives like "arbitrary line".
Will report to investors Ctracción as we spend on the Cartagena and how little respect the individual investments?
3rd-A because of the temporal coincidence of events as diverse as the collection of a building permit and the reclassification and / or use it for the same site by the same actors? Qualified facts as serious procedural error, such as administrative welter or simply scam?
4th - if I want to explain how to lift our town is canceling tourism projects that foster it and create wealth and employment?
5th - Can you explain the reasons why as a result of all this municipal action, dela Vd.es maximum charge that there is a lawsuit in which they accused their former Town Planning, Joaquín Segado, and all dome of urbanism?
6th -5 years later found the plot of contention in the same situation, ie, without any public facility, just a lot.
Does this justify the need for the expropriation of land and spending that has occurred you to our City, La Azohía and legal owners of the land?
7th-Counting our City with a plot intended for equipment in the same unit of action UA3 of Chapineta, ie, a few meters from Solar expropriated illegally Can you explain why you have created size problem will cost us more than 3 million?
I fdo.
José Martínez López
Joint Movement Group Spokesman-Citizen
EXCMA.
SRA.
CITY COUNCIL MAYOR CARTAGENA
Source: Movimiento Ciudadano
Privacy policy
- Legal notice
- Cookies