Portal de Cartagena
www.portaldecartagena.com
In addition, the constant derision and contempt of Widows to the voices against the Container Terminal in Gorguel, inappropriate to a charge of responsibility.
Ecologists in Action finds unacceptable pressure measurements with Adrian Angel Viudes away from the technical debate and attempts to coerce institutions and the public to link the construction and development of the cruise dock in St. Lucia with the construction of Container Terminal The Gorguel, and only there.
It is evident, for the umpteenth time, the personal engagement of this high office in carrying out its mega-projects in the location he wants, without regard to legal criteria, environmental, social and / or economic.
This irresponsible and irrational and arrogance led him to confess publicly in April that it will break the current legislation, saying it "is not looking for an alternative location for the project" because it believes that can only be carried out in El Gorguel.
The President of the APC strives with every public appearance on flaunting its low profile and disturbing democratic disregard for the legislation, which is required to implement and respect, as in the Environmental Sustainability Report (ISA), which has write the APC, it is essential to include a thorough analysis of alternatives, as required by law, and that's what the report says the Ministry of Environment regarding the contents of the ISA.
Among the alternatives studied, the environmentalists say should be viewed as "Alternative 0" as the "Alternative Escombreras Valley," the latter in order to maximize use of existing infrastructure partially unfinished, thus avoiding duplication of uses and impacts.
The association also points out that environmental Container Terminal does not have any permission so far.
Moreover, even with the approval of the Ministry of Development, it has recently eliminated Terminal Gorguel Mediterranean Corridor map, appearing now only the Port of Cartagena (as requested from the environmental group as there are no appropriate permits) .
They warn that this impressive megaproject only exceed state environmental law, must also have approval from the European Commission, which already stood the feet of a wild project of the APC to pre-fill the tailings basin using sterile toxic Portman.
On the other hand, Ecologists in Action unacceptable and undemocratic attitude of widows, who constantly belittles, mocks and insults the intelligence of groups and individuals, authoritative and competent (which are highly regarded technical), which oppose its Pharaonic and impressive project.
This is evident in various statements, such as the recent claim that he insisted that "the voices against are four belong to people who do not know what they say or do it for evil motives."
Statements that border on defamation.
In this regard, it should be mentioned that among those "voices who do not know what they say" is a team of the Universities of Murcia and Cartagena, solvency and prestige involved with the Sierra Minera Foundation to develop a comprehensive technical report on the environmental, scenic, geological and mining would be the installation of the planned container terminal in El Gorguel, being an area of ​​high biodiversity, geological and cultural wealth, which also has several protective figures regional, state and European level.
In any case, who should prove their training and knowledge of environment and heritage should be precisely widows, and that part of the derogatory statements, has not presented technical arguments in favor of the project has not even challenged those filed against him.
Finally, Ecologists in Action has lamented that since the government and politicians continue to insist on an exhausted model that has brought us to this crisis, the damage is to lose resources to the sustainable development of our region, and that of future generations.
Source: Ecologistas en Acción
Privacy policy
- Legal notice
- Cookies