Portal de Cartagena
www.portaldecartagena.com
- "The Research Commission of El Batel has managed to clarify certain issues, such as the first incomplete and incomplete geotechnical report, and I hope that we will not make the same mistakes again, that public money will never be invested without the necessary precautions and guarantees, Now it's about putting value and feeling proud of our audience, "said the spokesman for Citizens in Cartagena, Manuel Padín.
The spokesman for Citizens in Cartagena, Manuel Padín, has stated in his defense of the conclusions of the Commission of Inquiry that analyzes the extra cost in the construction of the Auditorium El Batel, that "we have supported at all times that investigate this question with the conviction That if there were political responsibilities they would have to be denounced, and if it were legal to denounce them where appropriate, "Padín said.
"I think it's time to remember everything that was said before the Batel Research Commission was started, how some commented on what was being stolen, how others claimed that the money was lost, I even had the opportunity to Witness and listen as one councilman was pointing to another who was going to get everything he had taken from El Batel ... and what has been all that? Nothing, what has served to sow so many suspicions, what have served So many accusations and recriminations? ", Asks the Citizens' spokesman.
Manuel Padin has said that "for this trip no saddlebags were needed, all the money is in the work, there were no responsibilities for overcharging by the municipal technicians, there has been a lack of municipal control at the beginning of the Until the creation of the Follow-up Commission, which in our opinion deserves the political reprobation of those who ruled, and a disheartening and ultimately prejudicial circumstance for the public interest: the architect José Selgas wins the competition for the construction of the Auditorium with A specification that grants full powers to do and undo at will, without giving explanations. "
According to Padín, "we have enough evidence to think that the decisions taken in the first phase of this project by Selgas, the epicenter of this whole matter, were not good, and that presumably carried a progressive set of modifications and extra costs, so we see It is advisable that the legal services of the City Council analyze the documentation to determine if there is any legal reproach to carry out.
For Manuel Padín, "this Commission has managed to clarify certain issues, such as the first incomplete and incomplete geotechnical report, and I hope that we will not make the same mistakes again, that public money will never be invested without the necessary precautions and guarantees. Suspicions, unfounded accusations, will not be clarified or diluted in a long time, now it is worth to feel proud of our audience. "In this sense, the spokesman reminded university professors that they were summoned to one of the meetings of the Commission for CTSSP-We can, "these professionals talked about that El Batel was a work to feel proud as a citizen, and that technically had no reproach to do."
"We have to take care of what is ours, talk about our best infrastructure with pride, and make the most of it."
Source: Ciudadanos Cartagena
Privacy policy
- Legal notice
- Cookies