Portal de Cartagena
www.portaldecartagena.com
"While the defendants face the request for penalties correctly announced by the prosecutor, PODEMOS continues to demand that the Mayor immediately initiate the process of annulment of the Novo Carthago Plan, as happened with the Zerrichera Plan"
CTSSP-Podemos can positively assess the penalties announced by the anti-corruption prosecutor.
Finally and thanks to the firmness of the environmentalist associations and the organized civil society of this Region, we see how those who have tried to drain our resources are face to face with a judge to give explanations.
They have been the ones who have fought very hard to denounce these cases2E It was these associations that had the courage to face the PP of the darkest years and thus could stop the project that was next to Novo Carthago for which he had planned to build more than 10,000 homes in the protected natural area of ​​Lo Poyo.
Novo Carthago is also an example of systematic abuse of the PP to the Mar Menor.
If today is as it is, we can not imagine the impact that the pressure of the two megalomanic macro-urbanizations on the lagoon would have had.
It is terrible what he has tried and what the PP has done with this Region.
We are facing one of the specialties of the PP, a case related to urban planning and public heritage where everything points to 2 requotes were made to the letter to the detriment of the natural heritage that belongs to us all.
This Region deserves us to pull the thread because all the corruption of the PP is connected and we want those who have put us in the mud so many years, and have taken advantage of us to benefit themselves and their cronies, end up paying.
As we said in his day, the Consistory can apply its powers and "declare null" or revise ex officio the change of planning.
And all this must be evaluated with absolute transparency, in the Planning Commission, and without taking unilateral decisions through the Local Government Board.
What is Ana Belén Castejón waiting for?
Why are you hiding in the request for an opinion from the Region's Legal Council, which is not mandatory?
Source: CTSSP
Privacy policy
- Legal notice
- Cookies