Unfortunately at present the teacher remains without protection and precise terms to develop, under appropriate conditions, their teaching in the interest of students, parents, guardians and society in general.
The Education Law and the Organic Law on the Right to Education, according to whether the issue of public or private, concluded, recognizing the center's director disciplinary capacity.
This allocation is unaware that for an adequate solution to the problems of discipline is preferable to being subjected to two principles: the principle of immediacy, which allows a better understanding of the problem and is a guarantee of success, and of the rapid reaction, which enhances the effectiveness the purposes of the penalty.
Not the director, but who knows with the teacher immediacy behavior of a student who is preventing or hindering the teaching and altering the coexistence in the classroom and who can quickly take disciplinary action immediately to correct that student or minor issues necessary precautionary measures if the matter is serious.
Hence, in this reform, proposes that the teacher can impose disciplinary action directly to the students in minor matters and take necessary precautionary measures in serious, always made that happen that prevent or hinder the teaching or complementary activity which the teacher is involved, and as indicated in the law.
UPyD requires recognition of the teacher's authority and adequately protect the right to learn from students, without the consent behavior of those who try to limit it to a misconduct, the administration has to provide it with public authority status.
So, is transmitted to society the importance to the education system is the professor, because otherwise it could not develop the fundamental right to education under Article 27 of the Constitution, in addition to enhanced legal protection against bad behavior and aggression, both students and parents or guardians
Source: UPyD Cartagena